- Thread starter046
- Start dateFeb 3, 2011
Help Support Arborist Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliatelinks, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
046
God of ArboristSite
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 77,369
- Reaction score
- 15,345
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Feb 3, 2011
- #1
We've been hearing for years about how Stihl 064 is barely heavier than a MS460,
but nearly powerfully as MS660 and tough as nails .... Well it's true!
now that I've got all at the same time. Stihl 064, 066, MS660 and 046.
IMHO Stihl 064 has the highest power to weight ratio of any big saw?
some folks call 064 an in between saw. might as well step up to 066.
well I disagree, Stihl 064 is considerably lighter and is closer to MS460.
if you've got to block down a large trunk up high and need raw HP....
064 may have the highest power to weight available for any big saw.
does anyone know of any big chainsaw with a higher power to weight ratio?
Last edited:
redoakneck
Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,275
- Reaction score
- 1,281
- Location
- ohio
- Feb 3, 2011
- #2
A scale and a dyno, all else is just speculation!!!
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 16,162
- Reaction score
- 7,167
- Location
- Somewhere in the space-time continuum
- Feb 3, 2011
- #3
well, going by mfg hp specs and actual weights of both an 064 and a 7900, the 7900 is slightly more powerful per lb of weight. .462hp/lb vs .431hp/lb
adam32
ArboristSite Operative
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2010
- Messages
- 237
- Reaction score
- 35
- Location
- Kookifornia
- Feb 3, 2011
- #4
046 said:
does anyone know of any big chainsaw with a higher power to weight ratio?
Yup...a big bore 064...
W
WACutter
ArboristSite Operative
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 364
- Reaction score
- 84
- Location
- WA
- Feb 3, 2011
- #5
The 064 is a Classic
I'm not sure about the highest power to weight, but it has to have one of the best. Count me in at the 064 Fan Club.
I don't use it too much anymore, but I love mine. It's been bumped around a lot, but it's pretty low mileage. This saw is like the 260 for me in that it is dead reliable....it ALWAYS starts in 3 pulls.
Of course, it pulls waaaaay better :good:
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 16,162
- Reaction score
- 7,167
- Location
- Somewhere in the space-time continuum
- Feb 3, 2011
- #6
stock saw the 7900 is tops (not sure if the 681 weighs the same as the 7900). non-stock, it just a matter of how much do you want to spend.
046
God of ArboristSite
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 77,369
- Reaction score
- 15,345
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Feb 3, 2011
- #7
Domar 7900 is listed as 13.6lb, an 78.5 cc saw ... has anyone actually put one on a scale to confirm? PS-7900
we all know how reliable factory figures can be...
nmurph said:
well, going by mfg hp specs and actual weights of both an 064 and a 7900, the 7900 is slightly more powerful per lb of weight. .462hp/lb vs .431hp/lb
Last edited:
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 16,162
- Reaction score
- 7,167
- Location
- Somewhere in the space-time continuum
- Feb 3, 2011
- #8
both saws were cleaned and emptied. scales have been checked against the PB postal scales at work. they are within a couple tenths of an ounce.
W
WACutter
ArboristSite Operative
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 364
- Reaction score
- 84
- Location
- WA
- Feb 3, 2011
- #9
7900 and 064
7900 @6.3hp and 6.4 Kg (14.1) lbs - From KWF Online. .447HP/lb. I think this is pretty close to what mine weighed when I got it, a little over 14 lbs.
064 @ 6.5hp and 7.1 Kg (15.6 lbs) from Stihl. .417HP/lb. Mine is the wrap model, so it is probably a bit heavier than this. I am too lazy to weigh it.....
Even in the best case, the 7900 has the 064 beat for hp to weight....torque is probably a different story given the displacement difference.
johnnylabguy
ArboristSite Guru
. AS Supporting Member.
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2008
- Messages
- 851
- Reaction score
- 854
- Location
- North Central Ohio
- Feb 3, 2011
- #10
I was waiting to read how many posts it would take for someone to chime in with the 7900. Also the best bang for the buck too. Got mine brand spankin' new for $680 out the door. Not going to find that with any big stihls. The 064 is a better looker in my mind though. But my wallet and my grin sure love the Dolmar!
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 16,162
- Reaction score
- 7,167
- Location
- Somewhere in the space-time continuum
- Feb 3, 2011
- #11
WACutter said:
7900 @6.3hp and 6.4 Kg (14.1) lbs - From KWF Online. .447HP/lb. I think this is pretty close to what mine weighed when I got it, a little over 14 lbs.
064 @ 6.5hp and 7.1 Kg (15.6 lbs) from Stihl. .417HP/lb. Mine is the wrap model, so it is probably a bit heavier than this. I am too lazy to weigh it.....
Even in the best case, the 7900 has the 064 beat for hp to weight....torque is probably a different story given the displacement difference.
that KWF weight must be without the clutch cover. i have four 7900's and they all weigh the same.
Brian VT
Addicted to ArboristSite
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,174
- Reaction score
- 340
- Location
- VT
- Feb 3, 2011
- #12
I want a 7900 really bad, and my dealer has one he would give me a deal on, but I just can't justify it for firewood.
Anything that I'd need the 7900 for would be too much work to move and split.
I pass when I'm offered those big stems any more, unless I can just have some fun cutting it up and leave it there. lol
046
God of ArboristSite
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 77,369
- Reaction score
- 15,345
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Feb 3, 2011
- #13
thanks for the actual weights nmurph!!!!
7900 14lb 10oz actual vs factory spec's are subject to fudge factor.
did anyone else notice the number times Stihl 064 got mentioned in the most durable saw thread? http://www.arboristsite.com/chainsaw/162228.htm
nmurph said:
that KWF weight must be without the clutch cover. i have four 7900's and they all weigh the same.
Last edited:
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2007
- Messages
- 16,162
- Reaction score
- 7,167
- Location
- Somewhere in the space-time continuum
- Feb 3, 2011
- #14
check those scales again; the 7900 is 14lb 10oz, the 064 is 15lb 4oz., and no, the 7900 noses the 064 out for P2W.
SkippyKtm
The Lorax, my FIL rip...
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,809
- Reaction score
- 1,301
- Location
- The quiet corner, CT USA
- Feb 3, 2011
- #15
Brian VT said:
I want a 7900 really bad, and my dealer has one he would give me a deal on, but I just can't justify it for firewood.
Anything that I'd need the 7900 for would be too much work to move and split.![]()
I pass when I'm offered those big stems any more, unless I can just have some fun cutting it up and leave it there. lol
I don't mind the big stuff, any of the decent logs go to my mill, and the low quality, big stuff i cut into stove lengths then "noodle" it into small enough chunks to lift. I usually bring 2 saws anyway, a little limber- say my trusty 346, and grab a big boy like an 066 or 394.
W
WACutter
ArboristSite Operative
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 364
- Reaction score
- 84
- Location
- WA
- Feb 3, 2011
- #16
nmurph said:
check those scales again; the 7900 is 14lb 10oz, the 064 is 15lb 4oz., and no, the 7900 noses the 064 out for P2W.
I'm going to have to measure my 7900 again. I didn't think it came out to 14 lbs 10. Could the BB weigh a bit more? My scale is older and probably less accurate than yours!
Both saws are awesome. The 064 is a classic, and the 7900 is certain to be.....
046
God of ArboristSite
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 77,369
- Reaction score
- 15,345
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Feb 3, 2011
- #17
oppsss... give me a bit... will be pulling out my scales soon.
here's a few listed spec's
038 044 046 064 ms440 ms441 ms460 specs facts
Trying to get the specs together on the most popular saws:
if you have anything to add you can post, relevant information only.
Stihl 038 s 3.4 kw 4.557 hp 66.8cm Bore 50 Stroke 34 Max rpm 13,500
Stihl 038 Mag 3.6 kw 4.825 hp 72.2cm Bore 52 Stroke 34 Max rpm 13,500 14.6lb
Stihl 044 (pre 2000 yr) 5.1 hp 13,500 rpm 50mm piston 10mm wrist pin
upgrade big bore kit not available due to 10mm wrist pin. (saws w 12mm wrist pin are upgradeable) 13 lbs wow!
Stihl 044 magnum 5.4 hp 13,500 rpm 50mm pn. Upgradeable 12mm wrist pin
stihl 046 magnum 6.1 hp 13,500 rpm 52mm pn. 14.3 lbs
Stihl 064 4.8kw 6.5hp 85cm Bore 52 Stroke 40 Max rpm 13,000 15.7lbs
stihl ms440 5.4 hp 13,500 rpm 50mm pn. 12mm wrist pin 13lb
stihl ms441 5.5 hp 13,500 rpm 14.8 lbs
stihl ms460 6.0 hp 13,500 rpm 52mm pn. 14.6 lbs
if you want to add anything to this post that would be helpful. thanx
http://www.arboristsite.com/chainsaw/150936.htm
---------------------
someone weight 064 and 046
14.6 vs. 14.9 pds. ca. 78 vs 85 cc
And you can put a 066 top end on the 064, or a less quality 066 BB......to get into the 90cc range
P.S. my 60cc 036 is lighter than my 51cc 028S, and that super is 11.8 pds, what 60cc boat anchor are you running?
P.P.S. I still like my old Homie Super XL it's a heavy but torquey 60cc beast with no AV, but will stump a 24" bar that the new revvers can't handle
http://www.arboristsite.com/chainsaw/150936.htm#post2502312
nmurph said:
check those scales again; the 7900 is 14lb 10oz, the 064 is 15lb 4oz., and no, the 7900 noses the 064 out for P2W.
Last edited:
johnnylabguy
ArboristSite Guru
. AS Supporting Member.
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2008
- Messages
- 851
- Reaction score
- 854
- Location
- North Central Ohio
- Feb 3, 2011
- #18
BrianVT, that's how you justify a 7900! You can buck them and then noodle them into smaller chunks in short order with a big saw! My 75 year old Dad was sweating how he was going to split some 34+ inch rounds of pin oak he dropped on his property when I pulled out the Dolmar and sliced 'em up in short order into easy to handle chunks. I think he was impressed(you can't do that easily with a smaller saw like his 025).
He still asked me to try to noodle a little staighter as the splits were coming out a little too angled for his liking for stacking. (These retirees can get a wee bit anal ya know!)
046
God of ArboristSite
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 77,369
- Reaction score
- 15,345
- Location
- Oklahoma
- Feb 3, 2011
- #19
blsnelling says 064 is only 5oz more than 046 ... that sounds about right last time I weight the saws.
blsnelling said:
They only weigh 5 oz more than a 046. Hard to beat that.
http://www.arboristsite.com/chainsaw/142409-2.htm#post2336073
blsnelling
Goosme!
. AS Supporting Member.
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 53,727
- Reaction score
- 33,322
- Location
- Franklin, OH
- Feb 3, 2011
- #20
An 064 only weighs 5 oz more than a 046. As far as the 7900 is concerned, can you bolt a 93 or 99cc topend on it? Didn't think so Is there a factory bolt on unlimited coil available for your saw? Nope? Are dealers around the corner anywhere in America? Nope again. I'll take the 064. 99cc right here, baby!